🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to ban social media access for those under 16 is creating waves internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and families are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of countries are exploring comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that smartphones and networks are "taking away our children's childhood". The policy is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has urged lawmakers to approve a law increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised families to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has adopted a symbolic statement demanding a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the move does not create binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a good first step," commented one MEP behind the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a future ban, arguing that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "based on strong data".

Previously, interest built behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the administration pledged to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. An organization set up by the family of a teenager who died after viewing dangerous platform posts suggests that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to build products and services that are safe and age appropriate for children," said a influential online safety campaigner.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, regulation is primarily unfolding at the state government level due to country-wide stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has approved a rule capping under-16s to one hour of social media access per day, with additional access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly enacted laws demanding parental consent for minors to create social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from certain figures to mimic this example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Outlook

Beyond the West, further nations are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, world agencies take a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The body points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in safety.

Even as this global discussion unfolds, the policies of this nation and its followers show that states internationally are less and less willing to delay for tech companies to make changes on their own.